Numeriska metoder för civilingenjörer, HT24, DT508G

Antal respondenter: 31
Antal svar: 11
Svarsfrekvens: 35,48 %


 

Kursansvarigs egen helhetsbild av kursen 
 The course went as usual with the massive load of topic that need to be covered. As mentioned year by year, the covers too much topics and is worth double the amount of time. My strongest suggestion is to make two courses out of it. 

Kommentar kring resultatet av studenternas kursvärdering 
 The students feedback is very positive and I very much appreciate it. I fully understand the load that the students feel and I am constantly working on it every year. But I would liked to have wished this already during the course to adapt. Otherwise, I agree with the students comments that the course is worth twice the amount of course points.

En sammanfattning av kursvärderingens fritextsvar  
 

Eventuella händelser under kursens gång som påverkat resultatet av kursvärderingen 
 Nothing special.

Kommentar kring examinationsresultat 
 Lab examination went very well and all students passed with very good grades. The written exam showed the usual distribution in passing. 

Kommentar kring andra former av utvärdering som skett under kursen, exempelvis av enskilda läraktiviteter 
 

Övriga kommentarer 
 

Planerad kursutveckling
 Finish the transition in the programming language from Matlab to Python.
 Adjust the load from the exercises.
 Prerecord som of the topics to have more time for training them. 

I vilken utsträckning har kursens innehåll och upplägg (t.ex. läraktiviteter, kursmaterial och examinationsuppgifter) hjälpt dig att nå kursens mål?Fördelning (%)
5 - Mycket hög45,5%
445,5%
30,0%
29,1%
1 - Mycket låg0,0%
Summa100,0%
Vilket omdöme vill du ge kursen som helhet? Fördelning (%)
5 - Mycket bra18,2%
463,6%
318,2%
20,0%
1 - Mycket dålig0,0%
Summa100,0%