Instrumental Analytical Methods, HT24, KE308G
Antal respondenter: 19
Antal svar: 8
Svarsfrekvens: 42,11 %
Kursansvarigs egen helhetsbild av kursen
Kommentar kring resultatet av studenternas kursvärdering
En sammanfattning av kursvärderingens fritextsvar
Eventuella händelser under kursens gång som påverkat resultatet av kursvärderingen
Kommentar kring examinationsresultat
Kommentar kring andra former av utvärdering som skett under kursen, exempelvis av enskilda läraktiviteter
Övriga kommentarer
Planerad kursutveckling
| I vilken utsträckning har kursens innehåll och upplägg (t.ex. läraktiviteter, kursmaterial och examinationsuppgifter) hjälpt dig att nå kursens mål? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Mycket hög | 0,0% |
| 4 | 62,5% |
| 3 | 37,5% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Mycket låg | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| Vilket omdöme vill du ge kursen som helhet? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Mycket bra | 37,5% |
| 4 | 50,0% |
| 3 | 12,5% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Mycket dålig | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| To what extent did the course content meet your expectations? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Fully met | 37,5% |
| 4 | 37,5% |
| 3 | 12,5% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Not at all | 0,0% |
| Don´t know | 12,5% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| To what degree have the course content and design (e.g. learning activities, course materials and examinations) helped you to meet the intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the course? You can view the course ILOs in this link: | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Very high | 12,5% |
| 4 | 62,5% |
| 3 | 12,5% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Very bad | 0,0% |
| Don´t know | 12,5% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| How do you perceive the workload during the curse in relation to the number of higher education credit (15 hp)? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - High workload | 12,5% |
| 4 | 25,0% |
| 3 | 62,5% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Low workload | 0,0% |
| Don´t know | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| How has the interaction between teachers/supervisors and students worked during the course? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Very good | 50,0% |
| 4 | 0,0% |
| 3 | 37,5% |
| 2 | 12,5% |
| 1 - Very bad | 0,0% |
| Don´t know | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| How has the interaction between students worked during the course, during laboratory work and group assignments? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Very good | 37,5% |
| 4 | 0,0% |
| 3 | 37,5% |
| 2 | 12,5% |
| 1 - Very bad | 12,5% |
| Don´t know | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| To what extent are the knowledge and skills from high school or from previous courses relevant to this course? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - To a very high extent | 50,0% |
| 4 | 25,0% |
| 3 | 12,5% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Not at all | 12,5% |
| Don´t know | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| In this course, we have aimed to combine theoretical and practical aspects of instrumental analytical methods. In your opinion, how balanced are the theory and hands-on sessions throughout the course? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Too much theory | 12,5% |
| 4 | 25,0% |
| 3 - Well-balanced course | 62,5% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Too much practice/hands-on | 0,0% |
| Don´t know | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| How would you rate the usefulness of the practical and hands-on sessions for understanding the course content? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Very useful | 75,0% |
| 4 | 12,5% |
| 3 | 12,5% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Not useful | 0,0% |
| Don´t know | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| How useful was the feedback provided on assignments and laboratory reports? | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Very useful | 25,0% |
| 4 | 25,0% |
| 3 | 12,5% |
| 2 | 12,5% |
| 1 - Not useful | 12,5% |
| Don´t know | 12,5% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| What is your assesment of the Module 1? Module 1 covered theory and discussion regarding instrumental techniques like FTIR, Raman, XRF and SEM. | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Very good | 12,5% |
| 4 | 50,0% |
| 3 | 25,0% |
| 2 | 12,5% |
| 1 - Very bad | 0,0% |
| Don´t know | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| What is your assesment of the Module 2? Module 2 covered ICP, LC and GC, as well as coupled techniques with a focus on different mass spectrometry (MS) approaches, with a focius on booth theoretical understanding and practical laboratory work. | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Very good | 25,0% |
| 4 | 62,5% |
| 3 | 12,5% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Very bad | 0,0% |
| Don´t know | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |
| What is your assesment of Module 3? Module 3 covered advanced topics in mass spectrometry, including non-target high-resolution mass spectrometry data processing, advances in mass spectrometry and basic concepts of mass spectra interpreation. | Fördelning (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 - Very good | 62,5% |
| 4 | 37,5% |
| 3 | 0,0% |
| 2 | 0,0% |
| 1 - Very bad | 0,0% |
| Don´t know | 0,0% |
| Summa | 100,0% |